YouTube advertising becoming dangerous
Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share
3 April 2017
Brands risk being associated with questionable content
Advertisers caught in the web of offensive online content are hoping Google fixes the problem. Pronto. Otherwise, those advertisers’ spots could introduce a terrorist video as part of their YouTube advertising plan.
Recently, AT&T and Johnson & Johnson threatened to pull their campaigns. Unilever, which owns several brands like Axe and Lipton, found objectionable content after three of its spots ran.
“What happens when social media goes wild because your ad introduces a video of a beheading? We live in an age where unspeakable crimes are broadcast live online, including on Facebook.”
The issue is this. YouTube, owned by Google, tries to prevent videos with racist, terrorist and pornographic content from getting to the site. However, those videos still squeak through. Brands then panic when their ads introduce such content within their YouTube advertising program. They are then associated with that content, especially if the glitch spreads across social media.
But brands need YouTube advertising. More than a billion hours of content are watched on YouTube each day. The best way to reach Millennials is advertising on YouTube because fewer of them watch TV than previous generations. They watch YouTube (and Netflix).
The Catch 22 of YouTube advertising
Brands need YouTube. But YouTube advertising can be dangerous. What happens when social media goes wild because your ad introduces a video of a beheading? We live in an age where unspeakable crimes are broadcast live online, including on Facebook.
New Google software promises to alleviate some of those fears about the Wild West that is the internet. According to The New York Times, new Google software examines context of those videos. And Google allows advertisers to ban certain channels from their advertising loop.
For those that don’t know, most online advertising is pretty random. Your ads are part of a larger loop simply shows your ad when your turn comes up. Advertisers risk their brands with so little control. Most viewers are unaware of how the system works.
Unilever and others, who considered pulling their ads, are reconsidering for two reasons. One, they need that access to audiences. And, two, there is trust in the Google brand.
Let’s say Yahoo owns YouTube. The trust factor would be low. The Google brand saves the day.
Sports betting Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 17 May 2018 Legal sports betting is here. What now? What are the ramifications of legal sports betting on professional leagues? For college sports? Hell, for the Winchester Dog Show? I’m joking on that last one. I...
Target Restock Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 16 May 2018 Target Restock at least makes an attempt Retailers, want yet another example of the death spiral you are in? Target announced yesterday that it is expanding next-day delivery service Target Restock...
Schwinn brand Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 15 May 2018 The Schwinn brand needs to change its brand architecture This post on the Schwinn brand is written by Stealing Share brand strategist Mark Dougherty Many moons ago, I was a young boy in Hopewell, NJ. It was...