The Google brand

Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share

10 October 2018

The Google brand doomed Google+

Google+ was doomed from the start. There are only so many social networks one can prefer. And, more importantly, there exists the little problem of the Google brand.

Google brandExecutives say they are shutting down Google+ because of security concerns after a breach went unreported. You see, that’s a problem. The Google brand means information. And, lately, it’s becoming clear that it’s information Google owns, not us.

Facebook selling user data, compromising millions of users, didn’t help the Google brand. Was it that hard to believe that Google was any less trustworthy?

There are those who believe Google owns too much power. It dominates internet search. Businesses rely on first page position of any Google search with important keywords.

In a way, that distrust remains the reason why Amazon’s Echo outshines Google Home. Maybe irrationally, we trust Amazon more than we trust Google. (And we’re probably being naive.)

“Right now, the Google brand is saddled with a permission problem. Because we trust so little of it, consumers don’t give it permission to further invade our space. Especially our digital space.”

The Google brand must mean more than simply information

But the lesson of axing Google+ is that it was never preferred because of the Google brand. Few actually trust it. And, in fact, the businesses (like mine) that did sport profiles on it only did because we were afraid Google would penalize us if we didn’t.

How paranoid is that?

So where does this leave the Google brand now? It has powerful market position in that its technology and use outreach just about everyone, including powerhouses Apple and Amazon. But it just isn’t trusted. In fact, in search, most of us feel trapped. We’ve been trained to use Google so much – and depend on it so desperately – that a sound search engine like Bing or Yahoo can’t really compete.

Right now, the Google brand is saddled with a permission problem. Because we trust so little of it, consumers don’t give it permission to further invade our space. Especially our digital space.

Going forward, transparency is certainly key. But its effort must go beyond that. It must tap into emotional beliefs that overcome (or replace) the fear we feel about the brand. That is, the Google brand must mean something else other than information. That isn’t enough anymore.

See more posts in the following related categories: Google brand

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walmart grocery delivery to overtake Amazon?

  Walmart grocery delivery   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 19 February 2019 Walmart grocery delivery to overtake Amazon? I hate grocery shopping. Let me say that up front. Every Saturday or Sunday, we trek to the nearest Harris Teeter and pile our cart...

Measuring TV advertising effectiveness

  TV Advertising Effectiveness   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 18 February 2019 Measuring TV advertising effectiveness I found a new study utterly hilarious as it says as much about the state of TV advertising effectiveness as it does about attention...

How feasible is the Toys R Us return?

  Toys R Us return   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 13 February 2019 How feasible is the Toys R Us return? It appears the rumors of Toys R Us demise are greatly exaggerated. Tru Kids Brands announces that it has begun the Toys R Us return by reopening...

Share This