CVS brand

Picture of Tom Dougherty

Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share

5 February 2020

The CVS brand just keeps getting…better

More than five years ago, the CVS brand positioned itself as a truly health supporter by refusing to sell cigarettes. And five years later, the brand stands as the market leader among national pharmacies in the US with 24.2% market share.

That’s because, in an industry in which location matters far more than it should, CVS captures a true brand position. By stating who it is for (those who want to be healthy) and who it is not for (those who don’t care). Most of us fall into the former camp, even if we don’t always live that way. But, in our minds, we aspire to that.

Now, the CVS brand continues to smarten up. Its latest ad campaign centers around the theme of “CVS customers are better,” then listing the reasons why. Such as “always staying on their prescriptions.”

“Mainly, because the CVS brand is about the customer and not the brand. It’s identifying who the CVS customer is, something few brands (let alone in the pharmacy category) accomplish.”

The health position CVS took five years ago allows the brand to make that claim. Basically, it’s believable. It wouldn’t be believable from Walgreens, which sports a very confused brand. Walmart could say its customers are smarter because of the lower costs, but its overall brand already suggests that.

Positioning yourself as best never works. So why does this “better” messaging from the CVS brand work?

CVS brand identifies the customer, not the pharmacy

Mainly, because it’s about the customer and not the brand. It’s identifying who the CVS customer is, something few brands (let alone in the pharmacy category) accomplish.

How would you define the Walgreens customer? The Rite Aid customer? You can’t, because those brands lack definition.

CVS brandIn addition, “better” is much more defensible than “best.” It’s a comparable word, while “best” is an over-claim that’s easy to ignore.

The competitors of the CVS brand must take note because depending on location for market share is a losing game when a competing brand appeals to target audiences emotionally.

Some years before CVS stopped selling cigarettes, we told a competitor that it should do exactly that. The company balked, saying cigarettes accounted for too much of its sales. We told them you couldn’t have an emotional pharmacy brand by selling something harmful.

If only they had listened. CVS smartened up, and now it’s getting…better.

See more posts in the following related categories: pharmacies

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cereal marketing takes a step back

  Cereal marketing  Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 30 November 2020Cereal marketing takes a step backWoe is the brand that buys into a trend, thinking it guarantees long-term success. Look at breakfast cereals, a category struggling. Or at least until...

Effective marketing: How to be noticed

  Effective marketing  Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 25 November 2020Effective marketing: How to be noticedMars, the maker of so many products it could go toe to toe with giant P&G, conducted a study that found marketers have about two seconds to...

Fast food marketing: Avoid inside-out thinking

  Fast food marketing  Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 23 November 2020Fast food marketing: Avoid inside-out thinkingThis is going to sound like a slam on White Castle, but it’s not. It’s just that the fast food chain is promoting an element that’s...

Share This