Progressive Insurance mistake
Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share
19 December 2017
Again. Another Progressive Insurance mistake.
I never really liked the Progressive television campaign. Flo is goofy and too old. And many of the spots are trite. Some will argue with me when I say that the campaign is a tribute to one Progressive Insurance mistake after another.
But, they are wrong.
If the campaign was effective, why does Progressive need the immense buy? You can sell anything if you repeat it enough.
Look at the numbers. These guys spend tons on frequency. Brands with an important and memorable message sacrifice reach for frequency.
“The only thing I hate more than Progressive’s Flo is how quick they are to spend dollars. It covers up many branding mistakes. This is just the latest in a long line of wasteful bucks.”
Flo is not the worst of the mistakes
Big ad spends are like makeup. They can cover up a lot of flaws.
Agencies should spend more time trying to figure out the highest emotional intensity in the category. That is the goal.
Own the most important idea that causes a customer to switch. Execute that idea. Leave the rest to tactics.
It is impossible to get a prospect to switch without awareness.
But don’t confuse awareness with importance or emotional intensity.
Look at this Progressive ad
At least we are not watching a soft lens hiding the fact that Flo is 85 years old.
See if you can spot the Progressive Insurance mistake in it.
Easy to spot mistakes
Do you like the ad? Let’s pretend, just for argument sakes, that you do. Are you enjoying the characters?
You may even find the over-the-top push at humor amusing. Go figure?
But, I have a REAL problem with the message. (Read about insurance branding here.)
Progressive Insurance and the agency that created it miss the issue.
What is the main message?
Progressive Insurance IS expert at comparisons. That’s the big take-away.
It is not the highest emotional intensity (the campaign lacks that entirely).
But play along with me now.
Jamie is part of Progressive. He represents Progressive Insurance. And he literally represents them. He is the main character in this commercial. He is the face of Progressive.
So, Jamie represents the value Progressive attempts to own. Expertise.
Progressive Insurance, if we believe the strategy, is expert at comparisons.
No. Not Jamie
But a symbol of Progressive is not an expert. He is blind.
And stupid (even if his goofiness is likable). The meta message here is clear. Progressive does NOT make understand comparisons.
In fact, it sucks at it.
Why does this matter?
Because it represents misunderstanding the brand. Progressive is color blind to brand equities.
Shit happens. Wasn’t it Abraham Lincoln who said, “Power creates shit and absolute power is absolutely shit” (or something along those lines)?
Is it another fatal Progressive Insurance mistake?
No. Not at all. We are forgetting that Progressive has almost unlimited budgets.
With enough money, you can even sell Sunny Delight. (Insurance marketing gets it wrong quite often.)
Spend on Progressive. Follow the Aflac Duck and the GEICO Gecko.
The Answer is SPEND MORE (and vote often).
Sports betting Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 17 May 2018 Legal sports betting is here. What now? What are the ramifications of legal sports betting on professional leagues? For college sports? Hell, for the Winchester Dog Show? I’m joking on that last one. I...
Target Restock Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 16 May 2018 Target Restock at least makes an attempt Retailers, want yet another example of the death spiral you are in? Target announced yesterday that it is expanding next-day delivery service Target Restock...
Schwinn brand Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 15 May 2018 The Schwinn brand needs to change its brand architecture This post on the Schwinn brand is written by Stealing Share brand strategist Mark Dougherty Many moons ago, I was a young boy in Hopewell, NJ. It was...