Microsoft and too many Surface tablets

Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share

30 July 2013

How to keep up (if you event want to)?

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has officially said on the record that Microsoft’s Surface tablets, especially its ARM-based RT version, were a big mistake. The $900 million in losses suggests some six million units are still left unsold.

The revelation should not be surprising to those of us who rarely, if ever, see Surface tablets outside the walls of Best Buy or Staples. His statement, however, encompasses more than just his “We built more devices than we could sell” admission.

“Honestly, Microsoft should take a lesson from Google, which is also making the transition from software to hardware, and also truly innovating.”

Instead, the real question is whether Microsoft should’ve made any Surface tablets at all.

Surface tabletsMicrosoft had two things working against it from the start. For one, Microsoft is so closely associated with its software that a move to hardware necessitated a true understanding of its brand so the hardware – like its software – fulfilled whatever Microsoft’s brand represented.

That didn’t happen. I know one thing: the Microsoft brand isn’t about flipping and dancing.

Here’s what also didn’t happen: Microsoft didn’t innovate, which was the second thing that worked against it. Surface tablets had a few interesting tweaks and additions to the tablet category, such as its touch cover and its Metro user interface. But those were cosmetic at best, not the innovative changes that could cause audiences addicted to the iPad to take notice.

Honestly, Microsoft should take a lesson from Google, which is also making the transition from software to hardware, and also truly innovating. Google understood that its brand was about seeing the world differently. (Anyone remember what the Internet was like before Google?)

Knowing its brand as well as it did led Google to its Google Glass, which represents a huge innovation and is “on brand” very snugly.

Microsoft’s hardware is seen as a fast follower, something very few consumers covet as a brand. A simple retool of the Surface, as Ballmer noted is underway, will not be Microsoft’s saving grace.

Microsoft has much more work to do than that.

See more posts in the following related categories: Google Google brand google glasses Microsoft Brand Microsoft Surface Surface tablets

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Social media study shows struggle with importance

  Social media study   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 13 May 2019 Social media study shows struggle with importance Many marketers love social media because it’s cheap. And you can measure it in terms of likes, shares, retweets and comments. But, as a...

Wake up, medical device marketers

  Medical device marketers   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 9 May 2019 Wake up, medical device marketers A few weeks back I wrote a post on pharmaceutical advertising, remember? That there's so much of it? Traditionally, medical devices have not...

A Styrofoam ban is a no brainer

  Styrofoam ban   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 8 May 2019 A Styrofoam ban is a no brainer Maine is banning Polystyrene, commonly known as Styrofoam. Good riddance. It can’t be reused, it’s difficult to recycle, it's not biodegradable and manufacturing...

Share This