Microsoft and too many Surface tablets

Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share

30 July 2013

How to keep up (if you event want to)?

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has officially said on the record that Microsoft’s Surface tablets, especially its ARM-based RT version, were a big mistake. The $900 million in losses suggests some six million units are still left unsold.

The revelation should not be surprising to those of us who rarely, if ever, see Surface tablets outside the walls of Best Buy or Staples. His statement, however, encompasses more than just his “We built more devices than we could sell” admission.

“Honestly, Microsoft should take a lesson from Google, which is also making the transition from software to hardware, and also truly innovating.”

Instead, the real question is whether Microsoft should’ve made any Surface tablets at all.

Surface tabletsMicrosoft had two things working against it from the start. For one, Microsoft is so closely associated with its software that a move to hardware necessitated a true understanding of its brand so the hardware – like its software – fulfilled whatever Microsoft’s brand represented.

That didn’t happen. I know one thing: the Microsoft brand isn’t about flipping and dancing.

Here’s what also didn’t happen: Microsoft didn’t innovate, which was the second thing that worked against it. Surface tablets had a few interesting tweaks and additions to the tablet category, such as its touch cover and its Metro user interface. But those were cosmetic at best, not the innovative changes that could cause audiences addicted to the iPad to take notice.

Honestly, Microsoft should take a lesson from Google, which is also making the transition from software to hardware, and also truly innovating. Google understood that its brand was about seeing the world differently. (Anyone remember what the Internet was like before Google?)

Knowing its brand as well as it did led Google to its Google Glass, which represents a huge innovation and is “on brand” very snugly.

Microsoft’s hardware is seen as a fast follower, something very few consumers covet as a brand. A simple retool of the Surface, as Ballmer noted is underway, will not be Microsoft’s saving grace.

Microsoft has much more work to do than that.

See more posts in the following related categories: Google Google brand google glasses Microsoft Brand Microsoft Surface Surface tablets

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Use Nextdoor, get rid of Facebook

  Nextdoor   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 11 December 2018 Use Nextdoor, get rid of Facebook About a year or so ago, I kissed Facebook goodbye. Much to my surprise, it’s making me use NextDoor more. My withdrawal from online communities probably isn’t a shocker...

Brand purpose is not what many think it is

  Brand Purpose   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 10 December 2018 Brand purpose is not what many think it is So, the marketing term of the year is Brand Purpose, as chosen by the Association of National Advertisers. And what do they use to demonstrate such a term...

Retail market changes are akin to climate change

  Retail market changes   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 6 December 2018 Retail market changes are akin to climate change Are you paying attention to the many retail market changes? I am. Some fundamental changes are afoot. I believe the days of large generalized...

Share This