Marketing Colleges like they were packaged goods
Marketing colleges. Packaged goods companies continue to fight for every drop of margin they can squeeze out of a crowded category.
Traditionally, the brand was burgeoned forward through product innovation, research, and development. New advertising campaigns rolled out when product improvements warranted them.
Preference and margins cannot be found in product enhancements and efficacy. These two improvements are simply the cost of doing business.
In today’s crowded market space your preference and margins stem directly from your brand. (read a new article on how population decline will affect colleges)
In reality most brand marketers and managers are actually product managers and are hard-pressed to describe their own brand in any terms other than banal category benefits. This pitfall is not to be unexpected.
Marketing Colleges. How Unique.
Furthermore, it is nearly impossible to mend a brand from the inside out due to the Herculean task of dispassionate brand evaluation and analysis.
It is important to note that your brand is not the identity of your product.
For example, Pampers is not the brand, rather it is the name by which consumers know the brand. Pampers is not about dryness and efficacy as it once was some years ago in a time when the brand was new and the category was immature and un-crowded.
USP still dominated packaged goods
Those were the days when brand marketers looked for the unique selling proposition (USP) that identified a differentiating product benefit.
“How the product is different and better” became the marketing mantra and R&D became the means to an improvement. As a result, the “brand” became product development driven, and the brand strategy fell out of those attributes.
Inevitably, the market changes over time.
There is no mystification among consumers that all brands of disposable diapers keep their baby dry and comfortable.
Most diapers fit well, stay in place, and eventually end up in landfills.
Therefore, when the diaper shopper goes to her local retailer, she believes that there is little difference between Pampers, Huggies, Luvs, or “store brand.” Sometimes she will choose based on the experience of “right fit” because different brands of diapers will fit her child better as her loved one grows and changes.
Frequently, she will decide based on price or an emotional connection that she neither examines nor understands.
Marketers think she will be influenced by the latest cartoon character or color scheme because they are still caught in the times of the stale USP paradigm. If it is so difficult to justify the margins based on product efficacy, what is left?
The essence of brand, the value the consumer invests in the brand itself, remains potent regardless of category or product.
Brand preference is not an investment in product benefits but rather an investment in self-description and often hidden precepts. What consumers buy today, beyond commodity category benefits, is a reflection of themselves and their lives.
When they choose a brand — a REAL brand — what they are in fact reinforcing is their identity, who they believe they are at that very moment in time. This is as true in marketing colleges as it is in marketing automobiles or anything else for that matter.
Due to the ample excavation required to bring the customer’s perceptive personality to the surface, brand development is more akin to anthropology than marketing.
If the customer sees their reflection within a brand and affirms, “Yes, I want to be that,” then you will keep them for life.
Any brand that understands that clearly will win easily in the crowded market place of similar products, similar claims, and similar price points.
Recognizing and evoking the most acute and important brandface with regard to your brand is a difficult process, but in that germinal seed of self-description you will find preference, margins, and loyalty.
What is that self-identification in education? How has marketing colleges changed. Not much I’m afraid.