The Sovereign State of Google

Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share

21 June 2016

My fickle relationship with the Google Monopoly

There is a Google monopoly.

Consider this — certain brand preferences are so rooted in us that it feels natural as breathing when we use one of these rooted products.

When I buy peanut butter, it’s always going to be Jif. When I buy something online, my go to is Amazon. When I buy spices, they will be McCormick.

And when I search online, I use Google. I mean, the Google monopoly.

Google monopoly

Why is Google right for searching but not for being in your home?

Thing is, I recently wrote a blog blasting Google Home. For those that don’t know, the Home is Google’s answer to the Amazon Echo.

A stand alone, voice-activated speaker. It will play music you request. Complete tasks rooted in its interface (like turning off your lights), and answer any trivial question you wish to ask it.

I remain steadfast in my claims about Google Home. I still don’t trust the tech giant.  Because,  I feel like it is always collecting and storing information on me and housing it in its servers.

Surely, I am not paranoid to suggest that. Right?

But then my mind comes back to this:

The Google monopoly is unrivaled when it comes to search engines. 

Google monopolyAdmit it. It’s the Google monopoly and everyone else.

When I find someone using Bing or Yahoo!, I feel pity for them. Don’t you feel the same? I wouldn’t be surprised if these noobs still had a Hotmail account and frequented AOL from a dial-up modem.

So then, if I don’t trust the intentions of the market leader, why the heck is it my preferred default search engine?

The Google monopoly is Easy.

It always has the answers I need. It provides me the most relatable search options without the clutter. What’s more, it’s smart.

Therefore, being smart means using the Google monopoly search engine as I need it. It also means recognizing its power and not inviting it into my home imbedded in a speaker that’s always on. That’s not smart.

See more posts in the following related categories: Bing Google Google Home Google monopoly Yahoo

2 Comments

  1. David Herrick

    Even if Google could convince me they are not listening in or collecting data – the thought of talking to anything that’s not human creeps me out enough that I would never have one of these in my home.

    The only place I disagree is peanut butter should be Skippy – not Jif.

    Reply
    • Tom Dougherty

      Skippy is the one I grew up on David. But I can’t usually even find it in my local market. Its Jiff or the highway.

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reasons why Whole Foods 365 died

  Whole Foods 365   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 15 January 2019 The reasons why Whole Foods 365 died If nothing else, you have to give it up to Whole Foods for seeing its mistake and not making it worse. The grocery chain announces it's discontinuing Whole...

The Sears company should just let it go

  Sears company   Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 10 January 2018 The Sears company should just let it go Sears receives a last minute reprieve from liquidation from chairman Edward Lampert and a hedge fund. Lampert submitted a revised bid of nearly $5 billion to...

Share This