Fast food chains now publishing calories
Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share
14 May 2013
Could fast food chains find themselves in a downturn?
Imagine your surprise the first time you pull up to any of one of your favorite fast food chains and find calories listed with each item.
That happened to me at Chick-fil-a recently, prompting the question: Do calories matter?
Yes, they do.
“My prediction: Publishing calories won’t be good for the fast food chain business. Now we’ll know.”
I planned to order a spicy chicken sandwich meal – 920 calories – but left with an eight-count nugget meal, which came in at only 700 calories. I switched my order to save 220 calories.
The number of fast food chain calories will surprise you
Slapping calorie counts on menus was not the decision of the fast food chains. The initiative is part of the national health care bill that requires restaurants with 20 or more locations include calorie counts on their menus. McDonald’s was the first to comply in November.
Consider Hardee’s Monster Thickburger: The burger alone contains 1,300 calories. Add a soda and fries, and the meal soars to 2,030 calories, putting a new spin on term indulgent.
My prediction: Publishing calories won’t be good for the fast food chain business. Now we’ll know.
TV ads Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 17 September 2018 TV ads using the same exact song Watching TV over the weekend (while ignoring Florence), the following two TV ads played back to back. Notice the similarities? (Hint: Turn up your volume.) ...
September 11 Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 11 September 2018 It’s September 11. And I forgot. Shame on me. It’s easy to get caught up in the mundanity of life. If you’re anything like me, the constant hubbub of the daily grind keeps a hold of you. Work,...
Twitter brand Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 10 September 2018 The Twitter brand only succeeds by banning abusers I have to admit that, originally, the thought of Twitter banning anyone seemed ridiculous. Even Alex Jones. The Twitter brand lives on banter, no...