Adidas and Reebok: Oh, where have you gone?
Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share
14 January 2015
Adidas and Reebok need to do more than copy Nike
The sneaker/workout apparel market turned upside down when Nike became the first to stop talking about benefits of its shoe and sported, “Just Do It.”
Since then, competitors have tried and tried to bite into Nike’s market share with little success. Converse, once the market leader, fell out of existence until Nike, of all companies, bought it and sold it as a fashion item.
“It is in this situation that Adidas is attempting to change course in two ways: 1) Use more US athletes to market Adidas shoes and 2) feature a free-range chicken for Reebok.”
The two competitors have been trying to claim more prominence ever since have been Adidas and Reebok, joining forces in 2006 when Adidas bought Reebok to create something of a juggernaut.
Or so it hoped. Nike still holds the market lead and Under Armor has usurped Adidas in the workout apparel market.
It is in this situation that Adidas is attempting to change course in two ways: 1) Use more US athletes to market Adidas shoes and 2) feature a free-range chicken for Reebok.
I’m not joking.
Adidas announced a new shoe marketed by Portland Trailblazer Damian Lillard as its North American President said: “I know we’re a soccer brand globally, but in the US we have to be about US sport. We can still be No. 1 in soccer, but that can’t be what drives our business.”
Adidas and the NFL
So Adidas signed up 250 NFL players and 250 MLB players, increasing their number of sponsored players dramatically. By itself, it’s not a bad idea as having athletes as spokespeople is a table stake in this category. (Nike was out front first with this strategy.) I just wish Adidas looked for something different so it would represent an actual choice emotionally.
If what Adidas is doing is simply equaling the field, its sub-brand of Reebok is using the Just Do It approach within the comedy stylings of a chicken.
At least Reebok isn’t talking directly about its shoes, and I’m always up for something different. But Live Free Range is overly clever, which as I noted on Monday rarely works.
Is this what Reebok claims is the highest emotional intensity in the category? Or is it (or, most likely, its ad agency) just trying to create some advertising noise to be noticed?
Well, it’s not the former, and probably more of the latter.
It still seems only Under Armor has learned the lessons of Nike over these many years. Adidas and its sub-brand, Reebok, are still running loose like a chicken with its head cut off.
The Zoom brand Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 7 July 2020 The Zoom brand shouldn’t play it safe moving forward The Zoom brand is one consumer service that’s becoming synonymous with success during the global pandemic. Which is why it needs to be as...
Washington Redskins Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 6 July 2020 Money drives Washington Redskins name change In the 1976 classic All the President’s Men, Deep Throat becomes agitated with Bob Woodward (played by Robert Redford) over his lack of...
MLB return? Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 16 June 2020 MLB return in jeopardy, so is the sport itself An MLB return to play would be more important to that sport than any other, yet major league baseball finds itself on the brink of disaster over...