Auto advertising: Nissan, Renault, the same?
Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share
1 June 2011
Check it out: A Nissan ad and a Renault one. Almost identical ideas.
Following up to yesterday’s post, I do believe we all need to look for cleaner and more sustainable ways to power things. As the electric car is both a hot topic and a meaningful attempt at becoming more environmentally responsible, I continued to dig a little after I wrote yesterday’s blog. Nissan’s new spots simply build the entire category of “electric” cars, but, as I said yesterday, it lacks any preference-building for Nissan’s Leaf, which often means only the market leader will be chosen (think, Toyota’s Prius). That’s one of the problems with auto advertising these days.
“These are two separate ads done by two different ad agencies that are exactly the same in nearly every way. How could something like this happen?”
Here is the ad in its entirety:
It is interesting, but it is only about the category of electric cars and you only know who the spot is for in the last few seconds.
Now look at this ad:
Do you remember who the first ad was for? I will give you a hint, it was not Renault even though you could be forgiven for thinking so.
These are two separate ads done by two different ad agencies that are exactly the same in nearly every way. How could something like this happen? It happens because neither ad has a message to create preference for the particular brand nor is the brand itself embedded in them. It’s indicative of what most auto advertising has become.
Instead they each rely on competing auto industry creative shops to come up with some clever way of talking about their brand of electric car when, in fact, each execution fell back to talking about the category of electric car because there was no strategy – and duplicated each other in the process.
This is what happens when there is no brand point of view (unless the brand of both Nissan and Renault happens to be exactly the same, which wouldn’t be a brand at all). The auto industry is floundering for meaning and has become so generic that the ads are no longer similar – they are identical. They are all saying, essentially, “Buy our brand because we make cars.”
Sadly, I think the automotive industry has done irreparable harm to itself and people are getting accustomed to buying a car brand simply because their cars have 4 wheels and an engine. and their previous one was running out of steam.
If that is what Nissan and Renault are after, they have succeeded.
Ataribox Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 18 July 2017 Ataribox is perfect for this moment in time I’ll repeat just as I have said in the past, “I am by no means a video gamer.” But I do know Atari and have an interest in Ataribox. But my lack of gaming skills...
Time rebranding Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 17 July 2017 Time rebranding is fools gold with name change News reports say there’s a Time rebranding effort afoot. And I think it’s fool’s gold to think that will make the company (and its magazines) more relevant....
Boston Scientific Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 13 July 2017 Boston Scientific TV spot doesn't create preference There are few, if any, companies that brand products and companies in the medical device category more than Stealing Share. We’ve worked with...