Making a Murderer is not a documentary
Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share
29 December 2015
There are two sides to every story
One of the pleasures of having a few days off around the holidays is catching up on the television and movies I had been meaning to watch.
My son, always the Netflix enthusiast, encouraged my wife and I to watch the documentary series, Making a Murderer. His excitable review was enough to entice us to binge 11 hours in three days.
“It’s not that they are wrong, but Making a Murderer never once shows another point of view.”
Here’s the thing, while I watched the totality of the series, I felt duped by its directors.
Making a Murderer broke a cardinal rule in presenting research (as do so many documentaries do now). Its problem was that it was made to be entertaining and not a vehicle for presenting unbiased facts. Presented research must always be without a slant. When it does, we should call it what it is. As in this particular case, a mini-series.
Making a Murderer brings up questions it can’t answer
More often than not, documentaries blur the lines between contrivance and distorted reality with hints of truth speckled in. Unfortunately, that distorted reality (the director’s take) shades our worldview. Don’t think so? Just type “Steven Avery” in Google and see the breath of biased articles and blog entries that you find. Not surprisingly, they share the same stance as the directors of Making a Murderer.
It’s not that they are wrong, but Making a Murderer never once shows another point of view.
Perhaps this is a symptom of the dumbing down of America. Daniel Patrick Moynihan seemed to think so when he stated that, “Dumbness has been steadily defined downward for several decades by a combination of heretofore irresistible forces. These include the triumph of video culture over print culture; a disjunction between Americans’ rising level of formal education and their shaky grasp of basic geography, science and history; and the fusion of anti-rationalism with anti-intellectualism.”
“Cast a cold eye on life.”
These words are etched on the tombstone of the Irish poet, William Butler Yeats, and also serve as the final stanza to his premonitory poem, “Under Ben Bulben.” I implore you to read this great work and apply it to this paradigm.
We must cast skepticism on the ideologies presented us and demand the information given has integrity and merit, and presents all sides without a self serving agenda.
These tenants are the bedrock of why Stealing Share works. We cannot help an client grow market share unless that client is willing to look at all perspectives first. Without this, be prepared to be a ship without sail.
After all is said, Making a Murderer was interesting and troubling. Moreover, it raised questions, as it should. But those questions like “What’s the flip side to this argument?” are not the questions I should be seeking to find answers to.
The Difference. Theme line or Tag line. Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 23 March 2017 Theme line vs tag line A tag line is not a brand theme line Don’t confuse an advertising tag line with a brand theme line. They serve different purposes. A tag line is a catch...
Online retailing exacts its pound of flesh Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 22 March 2017 Retailers are tumbling down like dominos No doubt about it. Retailing sits mired in a state of massive change. Today, Sears announces there is “substantial doubt” it can keep...
I'll just stick to the original Doritos, thank you Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 21 March 2017 I mean, what are Tapatio flavored Doritos anyway? Doritos is the snack food that does me in. And that’s saying a lot, because I am not a snack food kind of guy. I can...