 |


Browse all Market Studies
Market Study: Banking Industry Problems are Deep and Wide
More Trouble Ahead for Banks The banking category is in the midst of tough times. Certainly, the mortgage market has created much of the terrible financial news and the steep declines in shareholder value. Profits are down, confidence is low, and the heads of many of the nation’s largest banks have rolled or will be lopped-off soon. Is all of the bad news a result of the poor financial decisions the banking executives pursued to quench the greed of their shareholders? Is another fundamental problem looming on the horizon? A problem banks will be forced to come to terms with shortly? The answer is a resounding yes.
Tough economic times often reveal more fundamental flaws in an industry. For example, the skyrocketing fuel costs crippling the airline industry has opened a window to an operational model that is fundamentally flawed. If the airline executives use this momentary clarity to fix those problems, they will emerge more competitive and powerful. The same can be said of banks. No Brand Differentiation We conduct marketing research all over the globe, evaluating brand meanings, preference, loyalty, switching triggers and equity as the start to brand building – and the answers we are hearing are the same. The banking industry is in desperately bad shape.
No major bank has differentiated itself from the competitive set. As you’ll see, it’s shocking how similar the messaging is between the market’s players. Banks have been satisfied to spend recklessly on ineffectual advertising that does nothing more than build a bit of awareness and no preference instead of battling for customer loyalty based on definitive brand practices that create preference, As the chickens come home to roost, we can expect shareholders to hold these banks accountable for the huge sums spent on advertising and demand some return on that investment.
What Banks Do Today Consider the typical bank advertising you see every day. Ostensibly, most advertise to gain access into a new customer’s considered set of possible banking choices. The idea here is to create awareness in prospective borrowers and savers, and then instill in them a preference of a bank over the competition so that bank can attract assets. The banks are hopeful that a potential customer will leave their current bank, switching or adding, for example, checking accounts. The thinking is that most banking customers (and we will include credit unions in this mix as well) consider their primary bank to be the one in which they currently maintain their checking account. Once the bank has your primary checking account, it attempts to strengthen that relationship by gaining more “share of wallet.” They try to establish other types of accounts, ranging from CDs, savings, securities, credit cards, mortgages (gasp) to all manner of personal and business loans.
What Banks Need To Consider The science of stealing market share, which is the only reason to advertise in any mature marketplace (and banking is a very mature market), requires that you know and understand the answers to three questions about the target audience you wish to influence. - What constitutes the prospects’ belief systems and how can your brand best reflect the values and precepts of that target audience?
- What is the highest emotional intensity in the category, often represented by a key switching trigger?
- To what does the customer aspire and what are they most fearful of?
You will notice that the subjects of all of these questions are customers, not the bank and its services. This is because, in commodity markets, it is impossible to differentiate yourself based on product or service alone. In other words, you can’t grow a bank’s market share by “out-banking” a competitive bank. You need to instill the prospects’ self-description into the brand so powerfully that they are in fact choosing an extension of themselves rather than a brick and mortar bank. Today Banks Only Sell the Process of Banking Itself So what do banks tell you today that is meant to influence your loyalty and get you to switch brands? Well, as you will see, they promise that they listen to you and they feature free checking, ATMs, competitive rates, friendly employees, convenient hours and locations. These are simply descriptions of what it means to be a bank. Research proves that few pay for checking today, while most believe their bank is convenient and think the local branch employees are friendly. Otherwise, they would likely not stay. So, if a customer already has free checking, why would anyone switch banks so that they can get free checking or, as we have seen, “extra free checking”? This makes about as much sense as a restaurant trying to get new customers by advertising that they have food.
Two Big House of Cards Ready to Fall A bank’s first house of cards begins to tumble when shareholders ask the bank to demonstrate how effective the marketing dollars are being spent to create preference. Shareholders are demanding greater accountability, especially in the current financial climate. Banks are coming face-to-face with the fact that their marketing of brand preferences is a figment of their own imagination. What this means is that in a vastly similar market (see the individual brand analyses below), preference is being decided by location and convenience — the second house of cards that’s about to collapse.
In the absence of any demonstrable differentiation or preference, banks have traditionally invested in bricks-and-mortar and delivered asset deposit growth by building more branches. Therefore, the nature of growth can be categorized into more locations (organic growth) and acquisition (fiscal growth). Both of these, without brand preference supporting them, are disasters waiting to happen.
Banks Have Developed Little to No Brand Preference Currently, real estate and construction costs are the bank’s greatest investment and resulting main asset. Research demonstrates that customers, who have developed very little brand affinity with any major bank, are hoping that they will never need to visit a branch or ATM and can conduct their financial business with a debit card, direct deposits, email deposits and direct bill pay. The moment this desire becomes completely realized, the bank’s main asset quickly becomes its greatest liability and a bank branch simply becomes an expensive and cost-wasting billboard rather than a place of needed financial transaction. All of the investment in branch amenities, teller pods and meeting rooms is transformed into the habitat of dinosaurs.
Major Changes Ready to Happen For customers, the above scenario is not very far off. From the perspective of the bank, such pronouncements of doom have been heard before and are about as believable as those cranks who warned of over-exuberance in mortgage lending, the foolishness of interest-only home mortgages and the dangers of escalating ARMs.
This is the next shoe to drop and the general population cannot wait to rid itself of the need to visit a bank, and most have already done so. It is simply an inconvenient necessity. The Biggest Players Let’s start with the default winner in terms of who does the best job of branding. Be warned, however. The bar is set pretty low.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
Next
If you would like to send a private message to one of our strategists, Click Here

Click Here for Site Map |
|

The banking news on Wall Street has been uniformly bad in the past six months. Most of the decline has to do with the poor choices made in mortgage lending but it also illuminates a more fundamental weakness in bank brands. Simply put, none of them have one

Bank logos might all look different but rather than highlighting brand differences they simply mask similarities in promises and positioning
|