This attempt at a Blockbuster brand recovery is futile
Tom Dougherty, CEO – Stealing Share
16 December 2010
Because Blockbuster isn’t really fixing its brand
At Stealing Share, we talk a lot about the difference between branding and using table stakes to compete (i.e. banks offering free checking or a lot of ATM’s). Table stakes are merely the costs of entry, and should not be the framework of any company’s brand. This brings me to the Blockbuster brand.
Blockbuster, a once dominant company, is now on the verge of collapse due to years of focusing on creating efficiencies and not on building its brand. The problem with this method is that it is only a matter of time before competition finds its way in and you are unable to adjust to market forces.
“Blockbuster cannot compete on location with Netflix’s home delivery. On price, Blockbuster’s brick and mortar cannot undercut the $1 rentals available from a Redbox kiosk.”
At one point, Blockbuster was able to keep competition at bay through market saturation and pricing. While both are important, they are table stakes. All consumers would like to have their video store close, be able to rent for less and to return with no late fee. These should be the bare minimum requirements for any company in the video rental business.
The fact that the Blockbuster brand built its strategy based on these factors meant that any competitor who could be even more efficient could have a leg up and that is just what companies like Netflix and Redbox have done. In addition, any competitor that was at least as efficient would emerge if it had a brand that target audiences coveted. That would be Apple.
Blockbuster cannot compete on location with Netflix’s home delivery. On price, Blockbuster’s brick and mortar cannot undercut the $1 rentals available from a Redbox kiosk.
I would like to think that Blockbuster might see the importance of creating a meaningful Blockbuster brand to stimulate preference, but alas it does not appear to be the case. Over this past year, Blockbuster has focused its energy on closing many of their stores, pushing their DVD by mail service, implementing a Blockbuster OnDemand streaming service, and distributing movies through new Blockbuster branded Kiosks.
In their final attempt to rise from their recent bankruptcy filing, Blockbuster has again overlooked the importance of creating brand equity and has instead thrown their hat into every possible distribution method it can in the hopes that something works. Sadly, its underdog story severely lacks the sympathetic appeal fit for Hollywood. It is no Rudy.
Soderbergh Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 21 August 2017 Soderbergh, Logan Lucky and the changing movie If you’re a film director of a certain reputation, take heart in the business decisions made by Steven Soderbergh and his newest release, Logan Lucky. The...
Cleverness in advertising stinks: Prevagen Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 17 August 2017 Prevagen gets stupid Prevagen. The perfect example of brand masturbation. Brands try to speak directly to the emotions of prospective customers. Anything that gets in the way...
Amazon Instant Pickup Tom Dougherty, CEO - Stealing Share 16 August 2017 Is Amazon Instant Pickup just an automat? Amazon is doubling down on its push into traditional brick and mortar with its new Amazon Instant Pickup service for Prime and Student Prime members. The...